🔗 Share this article

A Danish man has been convicted of uploading nude scenes from copyrighted films and television shows on the social media site Reddit.

According to a law enforcement report reviewed by BBC News, the unnamed man shared 347 clips of nude content in a Reddit group he moderated, which were then watched 4.2 million times.

Danish authorities confirm he has been handed a 7-month suspended sentence for violating copyright laws.

Experts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked clause in Danish copyright law, with the court ruling that by taking the scenes out of their intended setting, the accused had harmed the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been found guilty of distributing more than 25 terabytes of copyrighted digital content.

From March 2022 to May 2023, the man known as "KlammereFyr" on Reddit posted sexually explicit clips including over 100 female performers.

He distributed them in the subreddit he was a moderator of.

Per the Danish copyright protection organization The Rights Alliance (TRA), his online community had more than 6,000 members and users were prompted to request clips of specific performers.

In 2023, campaigners filed the incident to the police on behalf of the impacted actors, directors and producers, which resulted in the forum being closed down.

One actress, among the actresses whose nude scenes were shared in the community, told Danish media at the period she felt there was a difference between being seen naked in a movie and being shown on Reddit.

The performer stated the uploads constituted "abuse".

'An important message'

The defendant was arrested in fall 2024 and pleaded culpable to the allegations recently.

In a comment following the verdict, the head of the Rights Alliance Maria Fredenslund said the decision sent an "important" signal "that infringements of artists' rights have repercussions".

The verdict is viewed as unprecedented in Denmark for its application of the "ethical protections" section of the Danish Copyright Act, which states an artist's work cannot be utilized in a way which violates their reputation.

Copyright law specialist Dr Alina Trapova told the media the case was "rare" for its emphasis on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them financially.

The extent to which the case could affect other countries is unclear.

But she added there may be "more and more of such cases" in the coming years with the advancement of artificial intelligence, where "the sanctity of an individual's work might be compromised with greater ease".